3D printing is more than just an advanced production technique. You can use it to create the most fascinating things you have always dreamed of. The world of 3D printing is filled with innovative technology to help unlock your creative potential. However, with so many options available, things can get a little confusing whether you’re new to 3D printing or expanding your horizons.
If you are got stuck to decide between the Anycubic i3 Mega and Creality Ender 3, reading this article might help you. By its end, we’re confident you’ll be able to make a decision regarding your preference.
Either Anycubic or Ender are two among the best 3D printer that you can find in the market worldwide effortlessly. At first sight, the two printers do not seem to differ much – not to mention the price difference. Generally, The main differences between Anycubic i3 Mega vs Ender 3 are:
- Anycubic i3 Mega has a more user-friendly and straight-forward assembly, whereas more time is required to set up the Ender 3
- Anycubic i3 Mega has a build volume of 210 x 210 x 205 mm, whereas Ender 3 has a larger build volume of 220 x 220 x 250 mm
- Anycubic i3 Mega is more expensive, whereas Ender 3 is a comparatively more affordable FDM printer
- Anycubic i3 Mega has a lower print speed resulting in more processing time, whereas Ender 3 has a higher printer speed
However, to get more detail comparison, let’s explore these two 3D printer by theirs design and performance. Read also: Prusa i3 MK3S Vs Ender 3.
DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
The Anycubic i3 Mega is built from a rigid, metal frame that lends to its stability while providing the printing process with a stable base. It comes mostly assembled, except for a few screws that need to be installed. It is, however, an easy process that a quick read of the manual can help with. Additionally, its Ultrabase print bed provides added stability during the printing process.
The printer also has double x limit switches which provide more level accuracy. It prints in resolutions as fine as 0.05 mm or as large as 0.3 mm. It can be used with the following materials:
PLA,ABS,HIPS,PETG, and Wood
On the other hand, the Creality Ender 3 has a larger build volume of 220 x 220 x 250 mm. Unlike the i3 Mega’s advanced Ultrabase print bed, it has a standard aluminum build plate that heats up. Ender 3 offers fine details up to 0.1 mm to around 0.4 mm large. The Ender 3 can be used with the following materials:
ABS,PLA, TPU, and PETG
|Prusa i3 MK3S||Ender 3|
|Product Dimensions||17.83 x 15.94 x 16.14 inches||8.7 x 8.7 x 9.8 inches|
|Shipping Weight||29.54 Pounds||17.64 Pounds|
|Best offer||Check price||Check price|
Notably, the i3 Mega uses a touch screen interface, whereas the Ender 3 has a monochrome screen that is controlled using a turn-knob.
Overall, both printers have a solid base with durable construction. The Ender 3 is clearly designed for larger prototypes. It may work as an excellent 3D printer for schools. Whereas, the i3 Mega is more suitable for smaller prints.
Ender 3 delivers remarkable quality prints for its price which have a smooth, solid finish. However, there is an issue, the plate bed of the printer is lacking in a little refinement. Being a standard plate bed, it isn’t as stable and would definitely benefit from having an auto-leveling feature.
Moreover, the nozzle may end up slamming into the bed which could ruin the layer’s progression. But, a few adjustments and awareness of the issue should keep it problem-free for the most part.
Much like the other Anycubic printers, the i3 Mega lives up to its mid-tier status. Its build plate, construction, and stability allow the printer to replicate its quality with its print.
Therefore, the Anycubic i3 Mega is definitely wins in terms of print quality between the two devices.
A 3D printer could be built with the best, innovative technologies, but fall short in terms of its software capabilities. It could alter what you can design and how well the printer is able to transform it into a reality.
Ender 3 uses a popular third-part slicing software known as Cura and comes with a standard version, but you can download the latest version from their website. The software can build your model which is then transferred for the printer to read through a USB or a micro-SD card.
Anycubic has a similar slicing software based on Cura, but it uses a custom version. Likewise, the prototype file is transferred through a USB or SD card.
In terms of software, it comes down to personal preference. Ender 3’s Cura is a market-leading up-to-date product that potentially has more flexibility. But, Anycubic’s software is specifically designed and tested against their product.
As we alluded to above, the i3 Mega has a simple assembly process with a few screws and an inspection of the manual to get you through it. The Ender 3, however, has a more lengthy assembly process. This means you might have to take some time to understand which part goes where making it less of a plug-and-play printer. Moreover, the main feature offered by Ender 3 is their Resume Print option. This essentially protects your print from any sudden damage from having a power outage or filament issue.
The i3 Mega also offers this, but it has a few other user-friendly options. Such as its Ultrabase heated plate for even stability, touchscreen interface, and a number of accessories to help you along the process. It may come down to what you specifically need, but the i3 Mega overall has a better user experience to offer.
Anycubic i3 Mega vs Ender 3
The Ender 3 is ideal for the hobbyist. Alternatively, we recommend Anycubic i3 Mega to be a suitable option for medical or other product prototype building. It can help you and your clients visualize designs.